This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.  Read our Cookies Policy.
Close
Eye News
  • Features
    • Close
    • Features
    • Allied Professions
    • Humanitarian
    • Interviews
    • AI & Oculomics
    • Ophthalmology
    • Optometry
    • Podcast videos
    • Supplements
  • Education
    • Close
    • Education
    • Learning Curve
    • Quiz
    • Top Tips
    • Trainees
    • Medico-Legal
    • The Truth Behind The Headlines
    • Case Reports
    • Pete's Bogus Journey
  • Reviews
    • Close
    • Reviews
    • Book Reviews
    • Journal Reviews
    • What's trending?
    • Tech Reviews
    • My Top Five
    • The Culture Section
  • Events
  • News
  • Product Guide
  • Industry News
  • Contact us
    • Close
    • Contact us
    • Write for Eye News
  • Home
  • Reviews
  • Journal Reviews
  • Congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction in patients with craniofacial abnormalities

Congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction in patients with craniofacial abnormalities
Reviewed by Hetvi Bhatt

1 May 2025 | Hetvi Bhatt | EYE - Oculoplastic, EYE - Orbit
Share This

This is a retrospective study including 1998 patients over a period of 10 years. Of this number, 41 patients were identified as having a craniofacial abnormality and congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction (CNLDO) (23.1 per 10,000 live births). Interestingly the most common craniofacial syndrome is documented as “syndrome suspected” with the second most common being Trismony 21. Including the group “syndrome suspected” could introduce bias to the data and the authors may have considered excluding this group due to lack of information. The authors report that 31.7% of CNLDO in the craniofacial cohort required probing and no patients in this group required dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR). Although the rate of probing is significantly higher compared to the non-craniofacial cohort, it is interesting that no patients required DCR. The authors conclude that CNLDO in a craniofacial cohort often presents later (6.2 months vs 3.7 months, p=0.035) and has increased odds of requiring intervention but continuing with watchful waiting up to one year of age is still a reasonable approach.

Incidence and clinical characteristics of congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction with concurrent craniofacial abnormalities among a population-based cohort.
Ashby G, Mohney BG, Wagner LH.
ORBIT
2024;43(5):583–7.
Share This
CONTRIBUTOR
Hetvi Bhatt

Sandwell and West Birmingham Hospitals NHS Trust, Birmingham, UK.

View Full Profile
Specialty
  • EYE - Cataract
  • EYE - Cornea
  • EYE - General
  • EYE - Glaucoma
  • EYE - Neuro-ophthalmology
  • EYE - Oculoplastic
  • EYE - Oncology
  • EYE - Orbit
  • EYE - Paediatrics
  • EYE - Pathology
  • EYE - Refractive
  • EYE - Strabismus
  • EYE - Vitreo-Retinal
Archive
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013

Top Of Page

9 Gayfield Square, 
Edinburgh EH1 3NT, UK.

Call: +44 (0)131 557 4184
www.pinpoint-scotland.com

WEBSITE DETAILS
  • Cookie Policy
  • Data Protection Notice
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
ABOUT US
  • Who we are
  • Register
  • Contact us
  • Contributors
  • Company Awards
DIGITAL ISSUES/GUIDELINES
  • Digital issues - Library
  • Supplements - Library
  • Guidelines
Accreditations
IPSO_FLAG_TEAL 2025.png cpdcertified.png

Pinpoint Scotland Ltd (Registered in Scotland No. SC068684) | © 2025 - Website by Gecko Agency