This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.  Read our Cookies Policy.
Close
Eye News
  • Features
    • Close
    • Features
    • Allied Professions
    • Humanitarian
    • Interviews
    • AI & Oculomics
    • Ophthalmology
    • Optometry
    • Podcast videos
    • Supplements
  • Education
    • Close
    • Education
    • Learning Curve
    • Quiz
    • Top Tips
    • Trainees
    • Medico-Legal
    • The Truth Behind The Headlines
    • Case Reports
    • Pete's Bogus Journey
  • Reviews
    • Close
    • Reviews
    • Book Reviews
    • Journal Reviews
    • What's trending?
    • Tech Reviews
    • My Top Five
    • The Culture Section
  • Events
  • News
  • Product Guide
  • Industry News
  • Contact us
    • Close
    • Contact us
    • Write for Eye News
  • Home
  • Reviews
  • Journal Reviews
  • Visual fatigue associated with greater online digital use during the pandemic

Visual fatigue associated with greater online digital use during the pandemic
Reviewed by Fiona Rowe

5 April 2022 | Fiona Rowe (Prof) | EYE - Paediatrics, EYE - Strabismus
Share This

The purpose of this study was to subjectively examine the degree of visual fatigue in children attending online classes during the pandemic and objectively evaluate accommodation and vergence of these children. The study was undertaken from July-August 2020 and recruited 46 children presenting with asthenopia (31 females, 15 males aged 14.47 ±1.95 years); 56.5% were emmetropic. All were attending online classes and 50% for over four hours daily. Mean duration of online classes was 3.08 ±1.68 hours / day; significantly higher than pre-pandemic (0.58 ±0.71). Mean convergance insufficiency symptom survery (CISS) score was 21.73 ±12.81 for children using digital devices for less than four hours and 30.34 ±12.0 for those using digital devices for greater than four hours. Mean values of near exophoria, near fusional vergence, negative relative accommodation and accommodative amplitude were significant different between the two groups at 2.13 ±4.89 vs. 5.21 ±5.13PD, 9.04 ±2.23 vs. 10.51 ±2.02PD, 1.84 ±0.63 vs. 2.23 ±0.72 and 8.95 ±0.96 vs. 9.78 ±0.95 respectively. Duration of online classes greater than four hours was the only significant risk factor for symptomatic CISS score. There was a marked decrease in outdoor activity during the pandemic: 0.58 ±0.88 hours. The authors acknowledge their small sample size and recommend further study. However, they recommend a cautious and restricted duration of digital use for children.

Binocular accommodative and vergence dysfunction in children attending online classes during the covid-19 pandemic: digital eye strain in kids (DESK) study-2.
Mohan A, Sen P, Shah C, et al.
JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC OPHTHALMOLOGY AND STRABISMUS
2021;58:224-31.
Share This
Fiona Rowe (Prof)
CONTRIBUTOR
Fiona Rowe (Prof)

Institute of Population Health, University of Liverpool, UK.

View Full Profile
Specialty
  • EYE - Cataract
  • EYE - Cornea
  • EYE - General
  • EYE - Glaucoma
  • EYE - Neuro-ophthalmology
  • EYE - Oculoplastic
  • EYE - Oncology
  • EYE - Orbit
  • EYE - Paediatrics
  • EYE - Pathology
  • EYE - Refractive
  • EYE - Strabismus
  • EYE - Vitreo-Retinal
Archive
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013

Top Of Page

9 Gayfield Square, 
Edinburgh EH1 3NT, UK.

Call: +44 (0)131 557 4184
www.pinpoint-scotland.com

WEBSITE DETAILS
  • Cookie Policy
  • Data Protection Notice
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
ABOUT US
  • Who we are
  • Register
  • Contact us
  • Contributors
  • Company Awards
DIGITAL ISSUES/GUIDELINES
  • Digital issues - Library
  • Supplements - Library
  • Guidelines
Accreditations
IPSO_FLAG_TEAL 2025.png cpdcertified.png

Pinpoint Scotland Ltd (Registered in Scotland No. SC068684) | © 2025 - Website by Gecko Agency