This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.  Read our Cookies Policy.
Close
Eye News
  • Features
    • Close
    • Features
    • Allied Professions
    • Humanitarian
    • Interviews
    • AI & Oculomics
    • Ophthalmology
    • Optometry
    • Podcast videos
    • Supplements
  • Education
    • Close
    • Education
    • Learning Curve
    • Quiz
    • Top Tips
    • Trainees
    • Medico-Legal
    • The Truth Behind The Headlines
    • Case Reports
    • Pete's Bogus Journey
  • Reviews
    • Close
    • Reviews
    • Book Reviews
    • Journal Reviews
    • What's trending?
    • Tech Reviews
    • My Top Five
    • The Culture Section
  • Events
  • News
  • Product Guide
  • Industry News
  • Contact us
    • Close
    • Contact us
    • Write for Eye News
  • Home
  • Reviews
  • Journal Reviews
  • Ten-year experience with intracameral chemotherapy for aqueous seeding in retinoblastoma: long-term efficacy, safety and toxicity

Ten-year experience with intracameral chemotherapy for aqueous seeding in retinoblastoma: long-term efficacy, safety and toxicity
Reviewed by Jonathan Chan

3 June 2024 | Jonathan Chan | EYE - Pathology, EYE - Oncology
Share This

This is a retrospective review of all consecutive patients with primary (n=4) or secondary non-iatrogenic (n=16) aqueous seeding (AS) treated by intracameral chemotherapy (ICC) in Lausanne between 2011 and 2020 with a minimum follow-up of one year. Aqueous seeding control was initially achieved in all cases with a mean five injections of melphalan (n=13) or topotecan (n=7). Three eyes had isolated AS relapse at a mean interval eight months after the first ICC course, which was resolved with the second course of ICC Melphalan. Fifteen eyes with concomitant tumour sites were treated with other therapies. Three eyes had brachytherapy for sectorial involvement; three eyes had proton beam with annular involvement for interciliary process seed implantation. Eighty-five percent (17/20 eyes) achieved eye preservation at an event free mean follow-up of 45 months for aqueous disease and 40 months for any intraocular activity. Three had enucleation due to refractory non-aqueous disease. All patients were alive and no metastasis, with mean follow-up of 48 months after first ICC course. Intracameral chemotherapy toxicity included iris atrophy (five cases), cataracts (four cases), posterior synechiae (two cases), and iris heterochromia (one eye). No patient had irreversible vision loss and useful normal vision was achieved in 82% (14/17 cases). The paper concluded that ICC is a useful option against retinoblastoma in AS cases.

Ten-year experience with intracameral chemotherapy for aqueous seeding in retinoblastoma: long-term efficacy, safety and toxicity.
Stathopoulos C, Beck-Popovic M, Moulin AP, Munier FL.
BRITISH JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY
2024;108:124–30.
Share This
CONTRIBUTOR
Jonathan Chan

Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Sheffield, UK.

View Full Profile
Specialty
  • EYE - Cataract
  • EYE - Cornea
  • EYE - General
  • EYE - Glaucoma
  • EYE - Neuro-ophthalmology
  • EYE - Oculoplastic
  • EYE - Oncology
  • EYE - Orbit
  • EYE - Paediatrics
  • EYE - Pathology
  • EYE - Refractive
  • EYE - Strabismus
  • EYE - Vitreo-Retinal
Archive
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013

Top Of Page

9 Gayfield Square, 
Edinburgh EH1 3NT, UK.

Call: +44 (0)131 557 4184
www.pinpoint-scotland.com

WEBSITE DETAILS
  • Cookie Policy
  • Data Protection Notice
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
ABOUT US
  • Who we are
  • Register
  • Contact us
  • Contributors
  • Company Awards
DIGITAL ISSUES/GUIDELINES
  • Digital issues - Library
  • Supplements - Library
  • Guidelines
Accreditations
IPSO_FLAG_TEAL 2025.png cpdcertified.png

Pinpoint Scotland Ltd (Registered in Scotland No. SC068684) | © 2025 - Website by Gecko Agency