This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.  Read our Cookies Policy.
Close
Eye News
  • Features
    • Close
    • Features
    • Allied Professions
    • Humanitarian
    • Interviews
    • AI & Oculomics
    • Ophthalmology
    • Optometry
    • Podcast videos
    • Supplements
  • Education
    • Close
    • Education
    • Learning Curve
    • Quiz
    • Top Tips
    • Trainees
    • Medico-Legal
    • The Truth Behind The Headlines
    • Case Reports
    • Pete's Bogus Journey
  • Reviews
    • Close
    • Reviews
    • Book Reviews
    • Journal Reviews
    • What's trending?
    • Tech Reviews
    • My Top Five
    • The Culture Section
  • Events
  • News
  • Product Guide
  • Industry News
  • Contact us
    • Close
    • Contact us
    • Write for Eye News
  • Home
  • Reviews
  • Journal Reviews
  • RAPD in glaucoma screening

RAPD in glaucoma screening
Reviewed by Lorraine North

1 June 2014 | Lorraine North | EYE - Glaucoma

A study was conducted to investigate the relative afferent pupillary defect (RAPD) by swinging flashlight as a potentially useful screening test for glaucomatous optic neuropathy. The authors recruited 107 subjects with or without glaucoma from a clinic population. A medical student with no prior ophthalmology experience was trained to test for RAPD using neutral density filters by a neuroophthalmologist. The student performed this masked study on all subjects and those that showed no RAPD then had the swinging light test repeated with 0.3, 0.6 and 0.9 neutral density filters. A result was deemed positive if the neutral density filter in front of the two eyes with subsequent RAPD testing resulted in an asymmetric pupillary response only when the filter was placed in front of one of the two eyes, but not the other. The medical charts were then reviewed to determine the absence or presence of glaucoma. Subgroup analysis was then performed on 67 subjects who had previously undergone cataract surgery. The authors report that RAPD with neutral density filters demonstrated a sensitivity and specificity of 66.7% and 82.9%, respectively, for all subjects and 68.8% and 88.6%, respectively, for those who had not previously undergone cataract surgery when used to screen for glaucomatous disease. A higher negative predictive value was, however, seen in the subgroup that had undergone cataract surgery. The authors recognised a number of limitations with the study, including clinic setting, personnel performing the test and the test was not deemed suitable for mild or advanced disease. However, this test combined with a number of other screening tests could be performed by a non-ophthalmologist making them useful screening tools.

Glaucoma screening using relative afferent pupillary defect.
Charalel RA, Lin HS, Singh K.
JOURNAL OF GLAUCOMA
2014;23(3):169-73.
Share This
CONTRIBUTOR
Lorraine North

Frimley Park Hospital, Frimley, UK.

View Full Profile
Specialty
  • EYE - Cataract
  • EYE - Cornea
  • EYE - General
  • EYE - Glaucoma
  • EYE - Neuro-ophthalmology
  • EYE - Oculoplastic
  • EYE - Oncology
  • EYE - Orbit
  • EYE - Paediatrics
  • EYE - Pathology
  • EYE - Refractive
  • EYE - Strabismus
  • EYE - Vitreo-Retinal
Archive
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013

Top Of Page

9 Gayfield Square, 
Edinburgh EH1 3NT, UK.

Call: +44 (0)131 557 4184
www.pinpoint-scotland.com

WEBSITE DETAILS
  • Cookie Policy
  • Data Protection Notice
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
ABOUT US
  • Who we are
  • Register
  • Contact us
  • Contributors
  • Company Awards
DIGITAL ISSUES/GUIDELINES
  • Digital issues - Library
  • Supplements - Library
  • Guidelines
Accreditations
IPSO_FLAG_TEAL 2025.png cpdcertified.png

Pinpoint Scotland Ltd (Registered in Scotland No. SC068684) | © 2025 - Website by Gecko Agency