This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.  Read our Cookies Policy.
Close
Eye News
  • Features
    • Close
    • Features
    • Allied Professions
    • Humanitarian
    • Interviews
    • AI & Oculomics
    • Ophthalmology
    • Optometry
    • Podcast videos
    • Supplements
  • Education
    • Close
    • Education
    • Learning Curve
    • Quiz
    • Top Tips
    • Trainees
    • Medico-Legal
    • The Truth Behind The Headlines
    • Case Reports
    • Pete's Bogus Journey
  • Reviews
    • Close
    • Reviews
    • Book Reviews
    • Journal Reviews
    • What's trending?
    • Tech Reviews
    • My Top Five
    • The Culture Section
  • Events
  • News
  • Product Guide
  • Industry News
  • Contact us
    • Close
    • Contact us
    • Write for Eye News
  • Home
  • Reviews
  • Journal Reviews
  • Ozurdex use in noninfectious uveitis

Ozurdex use in noninfectious uveitis
Reviewed by Saruban Pasu

1 June 2016 | Saruban Pasu | EYE - Vitreo-Retinal

Burkholder et al. reported the practice patterns of 45 respondents of approximately 176 surveyed members of the American Uveitis Society regarding the use of the Ozurdex implant. Most respondents performed the injection in either a procedure (41.0%) or clinic (23.1%) room, with just over one in five (20.5%) preferring an operating room. Over half (57.5%) used subconjunctival lidocaine as their primary anesthetic. The most frequent indication for injection was macular oedema (76.5%), whereas the most commonly associated diagnosis was pars planitis (24.7%), followed by multifocal choroiditis (18.8%), birdshot chorioretinitis (18.8%), and sarcoid associated uveitis (17.6%). The most commonly cited contraindication to injection was aphakia (62.2%) reflecting concern for anterior chamber migration of the implant with subsequent corneal decompensation. Other contraindications were glaucoma requiring more than two pressure lowering medications (54.0%), a history of corticosteroid-induced ocular hypertension (32.4%), and the presence of an anterior chamber intraocular lens (32.4%). Over one-third (37.7%) of respondents were of the opinion that the Ozurdex implant was effective for longer, whereas nearly three-quarters (71.4%) were of the opinion that the Ozurdex implant was less likely to cause corticosteroid induced ocular hypertension when compared with an anchored fluocinolone acetonide (FA) implant. Nearly half of all respondents (46.5%) preferred either a trial with at least one Ozurdex implant prior to placing an anchored FA implant, or using multiple DEX implants in place of an FA implant (48.8%). Nearly two-thirds (64.3%) responded that they did fewer anchored FA implants since the approval of Ozurdex implants. Additional long-term data are needed to better understand the risks and benefits of sequential Ozurdex implants. The authors noted the wide variability in practice patterns and the clearly perceived role for both the Ozurdex and FA implants in treating patients with chronic non-infectious uveitis. 

The dexamethasone intravitreal implant for noninfectious uveitis: practice patterns among uveitis specialists.
Burkholder BM, Moradi A, Thorne JE, Dunn JP.
OCULAR IMMUNOLOGY & INFLAMMATION
2015;23(6):444-53.
Share This
CONTRIBUTOR
Saruban Pasu

Moorfields Eye Hospital, London, UK.

View Full Profile
Specialty
  • EYE - Cataract
  • EYE - Cornea
  • EYE - General
  • EYE - Glaucoma
  • EYE - Neuro-ophthalmology
  • EYE - Oculoplastic
  • EYE - Oncology
  • EYE - Orbit
  • EYE - Paediatrics
  • EYE - Pathology
  • EYE - Refractive
  • EYE - Strabismus
  • EYE - Vitreo-Retinal
Archive
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013

Top Of Page

9 Gayfield Square, 
Edinburgh EH1 3NT, UK.

Call: +44 (0)131 557 4184
www.pinpoint-scotland.com

WEBSITE DETAILS
  • Cookie Policy
  • Data Protection Notice
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
ABOUT US
  • Who we are
  • Register
  • Contact us
  • Contributors
  • Company Awards
DIGITAL ISSUES/GUIDELINES
  • Digital issues - Library
  • Supplements - Library
  • Guidelines
Accreditations
IPSO_FLAG_TEAL 2025.png cpdcertified.png

Pinpoint Scotland Ltd (Registered in Scotland No. SC068684) | © 2025 - Website by Gecko Agency