This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.  Read our Cookies Policy.
Close
Eye News
  • Features
    • Close
    • Features
    • Allied Professions
    • Humanitarian
    • Interviews
    • AI & Oculomics
    • Ophthalmology
    • Optometry
    • Podcast videos
    • Supplements
  • Education
    • Close
    • Education
    • Learning Curve
    • Quiz
    • Top Tips
    • Trainees
    • Medico-Legal
    • The Truth Behind The Headlines
    • Case Reports
    • Pete's Bogus Journey
  • Reviews
    • Close
    • Reviews
    • Book Reviews
    • Journal Reviews
    • What's trending?
    • Tech Reviews
    • My Top Five
    • The Culture Section
  • Events
  • News
  • Product Guide
  • Industry News
  • Contact us
    • Close
    • Contact us
    • Write for Eye News
  • Home
  • Reviews
  • Journal Reviews
  • OCT biomarkers in asymmetric anti-VEGF response in bilateral diabetic macular oedema

OCT biomarkers in asymmetric anti-VEGF response in bilateral diabetic macular oedema
Reviewed by Su Young

1 December 2021 | Su Young | EYE - Vitreo-Retinal | Diabetic macular edema, aflibercept, optical coherence tomography, predictive, ranibizumab
Share This

This study aimed to identify optical coherence tomography (OCT) biomarkers for predicting response to anti-VEGF treatment in diabetic macular oedema (DMO). Bilateral DMO patients with asymmetric response to a loading dose of anti-VEGF (ranibizumab / aflibercept) treatment were retrospectively studied. The morphologic response criterion was defined as central subfield thickness (CST) ≤300µm; asymmetric response was defined as ≥10% difference in CST reduction between the eyes. The functional response criterion was defined as increase in logMAR acuity of ≥3 lines, with an increase below this threshold in the fellow eye considered an asymmetric response. Relationships between final morphologic and functional responses to anti-VEGF therapy and baseline values of the following OCT-derived biomarkers were evaluated: DMO subtype, CST, vitreoretinal interface anomalies, disorganisation of the inner retinal layers (DRIL), external limiting membrane (ELM) disruption, ellipsoid zone (EZ) disruption and subretinal fluid (SRF). After a loading dose of anti-VEGF, 31 eyes that met both morphologic and functional response criteria were classified as responders (RR) and 27 eyes that did not respond morphologically or functionally based on the defined criteria were classified as resistant (RT). The presence of SRF or simple epiretinal membrane (ERM) was not associated with any difference in treatment responses (p>.05), while tractional ERM, extensive DRIL (≥500µm), and ELM and EZ disruptions in the fovea-centered 1000µm zone were important OCT biomarkers in predicting resistance (p<.001). A multilayer perceptron model ranked predictive power as 100% for ELM disruption, 51.7% for tractional ERM, 25.4% for DRIL and 24.5% for EZ disruption. In summary, the authors note that extensive ELM disruption was the strongest OCT biomarker to predict anti-VEGF resistance, followed by tractional ERM. EZ disruption and DRIL had relatively lower predictive value.

 

Optical coherence tomography biomarkers in bilateral diabetic macular edema patients with asymmetric anti-VEGF response.
Koc F, Güven YZ, Egrilmez D, Aydın E.
SEMINARS IN OPHTHALMOLOGY
2021;36(5-6):444-51.
Share This
Su Young
CONTRIBUTOR
Su Young

Tennent Institute of Ophthalmology, NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde, UK.

View Full Profile
Specialty
  • EYE - Cataract
  • EYE - Cornea
  • EYE - General
  • EYE - Glaucoma
  • EYE - Neuro-ophthalmology
  • EYE - Oculoplastic
  • EYE - Oncology
  • EYE - Orbit
  • EYE - Paediatrics
  • EYE - Pathology
  • EYE - Refractive
  • EYE - Strabismus
  • EYE - Vitreo-Retinal
Archive
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013

Top Of Page

9 Gayfield Square, 
Edinburgh EH1 3NT, UK.

Call: +44 (0)131 557 4184
www.pinpoint-scotland.com

WEBSITE DETAILS
  • Cookie Policy
  • Data Protection Notice
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
ABOUT US
  • Who we are
  • Register
  • Contact us
  • Contributors
  • Company Awards
DIGITAL ISSUES/GUIDELINES
  • Digital issues - Library
  • Supplements - Library
  • Guidelines
Accreditations
IPSO_FLAG_TEAL 2025.png cpdcertified.png

Pinpoint Scotland Ltd (Registered in Scotland No. SC068684) | © 2025 - Website by Gecko Agency