This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.  Read our Cookies Policy.
Close
Eye News
  • Features
    • Close
    • Features
    • Allied Professions
    • Humanitarian
    • Interviews
    • AI & Oculomics
    • Ophthalmology
    • Optometry
    • Podcast videos
    • Supplements
  • Education
    • Close
    • Education
    • Learning Curve
    • Quiz
    • Top Tips
    • Trainees
    • Medico-Legal
    • The Truth Behind The Headlines
    • Case Reports
    • Pete's Bogus Journey
  • Reviews
    • Close
    • Reviews
    • Book Reviews
    • Journal Reviews
    • What's trending?
    • Tech Reviews
    • My Top Five
    • The Culture Section
  • Events
  • News
  • Product Guide
  • Industry News
  • Contact us
    • Close
    • Contact us
    • Write for Eye News
  • Home
  • Reviews
  • Journal Reviews
  • Microperimetry of subretinal drusenoid deposits

Microperimetry of subretinal drusenoid deposits
Reviewed by Bheemanagouda Patil

1 February 2014 | Bheemanagouda Patil | EYE - Vitreo-Retinal

Subretinal drusenoid deposits (SDD), originally termed ‘reticular pseudo-drusen’, have recently been identified by histology and optical coherence tomography (OCT) as aggregations located in the subretinal rather than the sub retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) space. These deposits affect the amount of light reaching the deeper layers. Spectral domain OCT (SD-OCT) shows disruption of inner segment / outer segment (IS / OS) band, which has been suggested to carry prognostic implications. This study evaluates the correlation between light sensitivity and SDD as measured with microperimetry. Twenty-one consecutive patients / eyes with SDD only were included in the study along with twenty patients / eyes in the control group. The control group had early macular degeneration in at least one eye. In all cases best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), colour fundus photography, fundus autofluorescence and SD-OCT with integrated microperimetry were performed. The mean BCVA in the SDD group was 0.18±0.14 LogMAR and the mean BCVA in the control group was 0.16±0.15 LogMAR. In eyes with SDD, the overall mean light sensitivity in the central macula (4.21± 2.46 dB) was significantly reduced when compared to the control group (6.81±2.12 dB). Correlation between BCVA and mean light sensitivity in the central 7x7mm square was low in the SDD group (Pearson’s rho = 0.4, p=0.01), while it was good in the control group (Pearson’s rho = 0.7, p=0.001).

Microperimetry of subretinal drusenoid deposits.
Forte R, Cennamo G, Crecchio G, Cennamo G.
OPHTHALMIC RESEARCH
2014;51(1):32-6.
Share This
CONTRIBUTOR
Bheemanagouda Patil

Waikato Hospital, Hamilton, New Zealand

View Full Profile
Specialty
  • EYE - Cataract
  • EYE - Cornea
  • EYE - General
  • EYE - Glaucoma
  • EYE - Neuro-ophthalmology
  • EYE - Oculoplastic
  • EYE - Oncology
  • EYE - Orbit
  • EYE - Paediatrics
  • EYE - Pathology
  • EYE - Refractive
  • EYE - Strabismus
  • EYE - Vitreo-Retinal
Archive
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013

Top Of Page

9 Gayfield Square, 
Edinburgh EH1 3NT, UK.

Call: +44 (0)131 557 4184
www.pinpoint-scotland.com

WEBSITE DETAILS
  • Cookie Policy
  • Data Protection Notice
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
ABOUT US
  • Who we are
  • Register
  • Contact us
  • Contributors
  • Company Awards
DIGITAL ISSUES/GUIDELINES
  • Digital issues - Library
  • Supplements - Library
  • Guidelines
Accreditations
IPSO_FLAG_TEAL 2025.png cpdcertified.png

Pinpoint Scotland Ltd (Registered in Scotland No. SC068684) | © 2025 - Website by Gecko Agency