This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.  Read our Cookies Policy.
Close
Eye News
  • Features
    • Close
    • Features
    • Allied Professions
    • Humanitarian
    • Interviews
    • AI & Oculomics
    • Ophthalmology
    • Optometry
    • Podcast videos
    • Supplements
  • Education
    • Close
    • Education
    • Learning Curve
    • Quiz
    • Top Tips
    • Trainees
    • Medico-Legal
    • The Truth Behind The Headlines
    • Case Reports
    • Pete's Bogus Journey
  • Reviews
    • Close
    • Reviews
    • Book Reviews
    • Journal Reviews
    • What's trending?
    • Tech Reviews
    • My Top Five
    • The Culture Section
  • Events
  • News
  • Product Guide
  • Industry News
  • Contact us
    • Close
    • Contact us
    • Write for Eye News
  • Home
  • Reviews
  • Journal Reviews
  • Measuring cyclotorsion

Measuring cyclotorsion
Reviewed by Fiona Rowe

1 August 2017 | Fiona Rowe (Prof) | EYE - Paediatrics, EYE - Strabismus

The aim of this study was to investigate if different methods of measuring cyclotorsion (synoptophore, KM screen test and single Maddox rod test) produce the same results and if these values are repeatable in adult patients. For the synoptophore, the A17a/18a slides were used (cross and segmented circule) and aligned so both were vertical and the cross within the circle. The single Maddox rod was used at 3m distance within a trial frame. The single lens was aligned vertically to produce a horizontal streak image and turned so it was perceived to be horizontal. The KM screen was at 1m distance with use of red / green glasses. Movement of the computer mouse allowed overlay of the horizontal line box over the horizontal line image. Twenty subjects were included in the study; aged 48 years (28-69) and 95% with vertical deviation. 55% were excyclo on the synotophore, 90% with single Maddox rod and 75% on KM screen at first testing. At second test, 55% were excyclo on the synotophore, 85% with single Maddox rod and 50% on KM screen. There was a significant difference between the synoptophore and single Maddox rod plus the single Maddox rod versus the KM screen. All tests were reproducible for each test-retest with high repeatability. The single Maddox rod measured larger amounts and the synopthore measured the least. The three tests are not interchangeable. However, individually they are repeatable so can be relied on for measuring torsion in the same patients over time. 

Cyclotorsion measured in a patient population using three different methods: a comparative study.
Flodin S, Karlsson P, Gronlund MA.
STRABISMUS
2016;24(1):28-36.
Share This
Fiona Rowe (Prof)
CONTRIBUTOR
Fiona Rowe (Prof)

Institute of Population Health, University of Liverpool, UK.

View Full Profile
Specialty
  • EYE - Cataract
  • EYE - Cornea
  • EYE - General
  • EYE - Glaucoma
  • EYE - Neuro-ophthalmology
  • EYE - Oculoplastic
  • EYE - Oncology
  • EYE - Orbit
  • EYE - Paediatrics
  • EYE - Pathology
  • EYE - Refractive
  • EYE - Strabismus
  • EYE - Vitreo-Retinal
Archive
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013

Top Of Page

9 Gayfield Square, 
Edinburgh EH1 3NT, UK.

Call: +44 (0)131 557 4184
www.pinpoint-scotland.com

WEBSITE DETAILS
  • Cookie Policy
  • Data Protection Notice
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
ABOUT US
  • Who we are
  • Register
  • Contact us
  • Contributors
  • Company Awards
DIGITAL ISSUES/GUIDELINES
  • Digital issues - Library
  • Supplements - Library
  • Guidelines
Accreditations
IPSO_FLAG_TEAL 2025.png cpdcertified.png

Pinpoint Scotland Ltd (Registered in Scotland No. SC068684) | © 2025 - Website by Gecko Agency