This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.  Read our Cookies Policy.
Close
Eye News
  • Features
    • Close
    • Features
    • Allied Professions
    • Humanitarian
    • Interviews
    • AI & Oculomics
    • Ophthalmology
    • Optometry
    • Podcast videos
    • Supplements
  • Education
    • Close
    • Education
    • Learning Curve
    • Quiz
    • Top Tips
    • Trainees
    • Medico-Legal
    • The Truth Behind The Headlines
    • Case Reports
    • Pete's Bogus Journey
  • Reviews
    • Close
    • Reviews
    • Book Reviews
    • Journal Reviews
    • What's trending?
    • Tech Reviews
    • My Top Five
    • The Culture Section
  • Events
  • News
  • Product Guide
  • Industry News
  • Contact us
    • Close
    • Contact us
    • Write for Eye News
  • Home
  • Reviews
  • Journal Reviews
  • Fixed or variable Muller’s muscle resection

Fixed or variable Muller’s muscle resection
Reviewed by James Hsuan

1 October 2018 | James Hsuan | EYE - Oculoplastic, EYE - Orbit

This is a retrospective analysis of 60 patients who underwent posterior approach ptosis surgery utilising a Muller’s muscle resection. The study compares those who underwent a fixed resection length of 7mm of Muller’s muscle with those having a variable resection length based on a 4:1 ratio of resection length to desired elevation. There were 30 eyes in both groups, which had no significant difference in age, sex, the degree of preoperative ptosis or brow height. There was no overall difference in the average amount of resection, but the variable group ranged from 4.5 to 9mm. Interestingly, there was no difference either in the average final margin reflex distance to the upper lid (MRD1) or the change in MRD1. Regression analysis failed to show a correlation between amount of tissue resected and change in MRD1 in either group. However, there was a positive correlation between the degree of preoperative ptosis and the change in MRD1. The authors comment that the results throw into question the mechanism behind Muller’s muscle resection, with the data implying this is not a simple mechanical effect as the change in lid height was independent of the resection length. They speculate on other possible mechanisms, suggesting that the changes in afferent and efferent activity, including proprioception and visual input might play a part. Although the mechanism remains obscure, the conclusion that a variable 4:1 resection length and a fixed 7mm resection achieve the same results seems valid.

Change in eyelid position following Muller’s muscle conjunctival resection with a standard versus variable resection length.
Rootman DB, Sinha KR, Goldberg RA.
OPHTHALMIC PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY
2018;34:355-60.
Share This
James Hsuan
CONTRIBUTOR
James Hsuan

Aintree University Hospital, Liverpool, UK.

View Full Profile
Specialty
  • EYE - Cataract
  • EYE - Cornea
  • EYE - General
  • EYE - Glaucoma
  • EYE - Neuro-ophthalmology
  • EYE - Oculoplastic
  • EYE - Oncology
  • EYE - Orbit
  • EYE - Paediatrics
  • EYE - Pathology
  • EYE - Refractive
  • EYE - Strabismus
  • EYE - Vitreo-Retinal
Archive
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013

Top Of Page

9 Gayfield Square, 
Edinburgh EH1 3NT, UK.

Call: +44 (0)131 557 4184
www.pinpoint-scotland.com

WEBSITE DETAILS
  • Cookie Policy
  • Data Protection Notice
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
ABOUT US
  • Who we are
  • Register
  • Contact us
  • Contributors
  • Company Awards
DIGITAL ISSUES/GUIDELINES
  • Digital issues - Library
  • Supplements - Library
  • Guidelines
Accreditations
IPSO_FLAG_TEAL 2025.png cpdcertified.png

Pinpoint Scotland Ltd (Registered in Scotland No. SC068684) | © 2025 - Website by Gecko Agency