This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.  Read our Cookies Policy.
Close
Eye News
  • Features
    • Close
    • Features
    • Allied Professions
    • Humanitarian
    • Interviews
    • AI & Oculomics
    • Ophthalmology
    • Optometry
    • Podcast videos
    • Supplements
  • Education
    • Close
    • Education
    • Learning Curve
    • Quiz
    • Top Tips
    • Trainees
    • Medico-Legal
    • The Truth Behind The Headlines
    • Case Reports
    • Pete's Bogus Journey
  • Reviews
    • Close
    • Reviews
    • Book Reviews
    • Journal Reviews
    • What's trending?
    • Tech Reviews
    • My Top Five
    • The Culture Section
  • Events
  • News
  • Product Guide
  • Industry News
  • Contact us
    • Close
    • Contact us
    • Write for Eye News
  • Home
  • Reviews
  • Journal Reviews
  • Facilitators and barriers to conducting research

Facilitators and barriers to conducting research
Reviewed by Fiona Rowe

1 December 2015 | Fiona Rowe (Prof) | EYE - Paediatrics, EYE - Strabismus

A survey of clinicians and researchers across the UK was conducted to identify barriers to research and potential solutions. The authors extracted details of studies listed on the UKCRN database that involved paediatric ophthalmology with recruitment of children. An e-survey was sent out to evaluate researchers’ experiences. Forty two studies were identified – 26 active and 16 closed / suspended. Four added studies were identified from searching other speciality group database entries. Eighteen studies were based in London and the remainder elsewhere in the UK (Newcastle, Liverpool, Manchester, Edinburgh, Leeds, Leicester and Southampton). Most addressed phenotype / genotype and observation studies. Four were RCTs. A survey was distributed to research teams with 51 returns relating to 23 of the 46 studies. Ninety-two percent had or were involved in UKCRN portfolio studies. Thirty-nine percent of responses were from site principal investigators. Seventy-eight percent were based at tertiary referral centres. Sixty percent confirmed recruitment was to target. Experience, presence, motivation and availability of a designated research team were the strongest facilitators for recruitment. Family attitudes toward taking interventional medications or placebos or preference for a treatment were the strongest barriers. Administrative difficulties such as opening sites and burden of additional visits or investigations were also strong barriers. Improvements in support, time, space, communication, protocols, patient and public involvement, and ethical / NHS approval / administration would improve recruitment. 

Delivering clinical trials and observation studies in child eye health: a nationwide survey in the UK.
Banteka M, Tailor U, Dalmann-Noar A.
JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC OPHTHALMOLOGY AND STRABISMUS
2015;52:106-12.
Share This
Fiona Rowe (Prof)
CONTRIBUTOR
Fiona Rowe (Prof)

Institute of Population Health, University of Liverpool, UK.

View Full Profile
Specialty
  • EYE - Cataract
  • EYE - Cornea
  • EYE - General
  • EYE - Glaucoma
  • EYE - Neuro-ophthalmology
  • EYE - Oculoplastic
  • EYE - Oncology
  • EYE - Orbit
  • EYE - Paediatrics
  • EYE - Pathology
  • EYE - Refractive
  • EYE - Strabismus
  • EYE - Vitreo-Retinal
Archive
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013

Top Of Page

9 Gayfield Square, 
Edinburgh EH1 3NT, UK.

Call: +44 (0)131 557 4184
www.pinpoint-scotland.com

WEBSITE DETAILS
  • Cookie Policy
  • Data Protection Notice
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
ABOUT US
  • Who we are
  • Register
  • Contact us
  • Contributors
  • Company Awards
DIGITAL ISSUES/GUIDELINES
  • Digital issues - Library
  • Supplements - Library
  • Guidelines
Accreditations
IPSO_FLAG_TEAL 2025.png cpdcertified.png

Pinpoint Scotland Ltd (Registered in Scotland No. SC068684) | © 2025 - Website by Gecko Agency