This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.  Read our Cookies Policy.
Close
Eye News
  • Features
    • Close
    • Features
    • Allied Professions
    • Humanitarian
    • Interviews
    • AI & Oculomics
    • Ophthalmology
    • Optometry
    • Podcast videos
    • Supplements
  • Education
    • Close
    • Education
    • Learning Curve
    • Quiz
    • Top Tips
    • Trainees
    • Medico-Legal
    • The Truth Behind The Headlines
    • Case Reports
    • Pete's Bogus Journey
  • Reviews
    • Close
    • Reviews
    • Book Reviews
    • Journal Reviews
    • What's trending?
    • Tech Reviews
    • My Top Five
    • The Culture Section
  • Events
  • News
  • Product Guide
  • Industry News
  • Contact us
    • Close
    • Contact us
    • Write for Eye News
  • Home
  • Reviews
  • Journal Reviews
  • Efficacy of BT as a treatment for cranial nerve palsy in acute and chronic cases

Efficacy of BT as a treatment for cranial nerve palsy in acute and chronic cases
Reviewed by Fiona Rowe

4 December 2024 | Fiona Rowe (Prof) | EYE - Paediatrics, EYE - Strabismus
Share This

The authors performed a meta-analysis of all patients’ treatment with botulinum toxin (BT) for cranial nerve palsy (CNP) to determine the efficacy of BT in the treatment of CNP due to a variety of causes. The search identified 1129 articles from which 182 had full text evaluation, and 38 met inclusion criteria. These included 29 case series studies, six non-randomised controlled trials, one randomised controlled trial and two case reports. A total of 643 patients were included across all articles: mean age 41.9 ±14.2 years. Thirty-one studies reported sixth CNP, five fourth CNP and four third CNP. Acute CNP was reported in 19 studies and chronic in 11. Medial rectus BT was given for sixth CNP, lateral rectus BT for third CNP and inferior oblique or contralateral inferior rectus for fourth CNP. Mean number of injections was 1.3 for acute cases and 1.9 for chronic. Success rate overall was 79% for acute and 33% for chronic CNP. There were no significant differences for age, type of BT, angle of deviation, follow-up period, dose and number of injections, and unilateral vs bilateral cases. For sixth CNP, the best success was for diabetic cases and worst for those caused by tumour or vascular aetiology. Spontaneous recovery rates without BT injection were 52% for acute and 16% for chronic cases. The results indicate higher efficacy of BT over no treatment or spontaneous recovery rates for acute cases. There was no difference for chronic cases and therefore limited evidence for BT as a treatment option for chronic sixth CNP. Mean difference in angle of deviation from pre to post BT was higher for acute than chronic cases: -23.06 vs -14.44PD. Greatest improvement was seen within the first four months compared to the 4–12 month follow-up period. The authors conclude these patients need comprehensive assessment and follow-up to plot symptoms and requirement for BT injection.

Botulinum toxin injections for the treatment of third, fourth and sixth nerve palsy: a meta-analysis.
Khalili MR, Roshanshad A, Vardanjani HM.
JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC OPHTHALMOLOGY AND STRABISMUS
2024;61(3):160–71.
Share This
Fiona Rowe (Prof)
CONTRIBUTOR
Fiona Rowe (Prof)

Institute of Population Health, University of Liverpool, UK.

View Full Profile
Specialty
  • EYE - Cataract
  • EYE - Cornea
  • EYE - General
  • EYE - Glaucoma
  • EYE - Neuro-ophthalmology
  • EYE - Oculoplastic
  • EYE - Oncology
  • EYE - Orbit
  • EYE - Paediatrics
  • EYE - Pathology
  • EYE - Refractive
  • EYE - Strabismus
  • EYE - Vitreo-Retinal
Archive
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013

Top Of Page

9 Gayfield Square, 
Edinburgh EH1 3NT, UK.

Call: +44 (0)131 557 4184
www.pinpoint-scotland.com

WEBSITE DETAILS
  • Cookie Policy
  • Data Protection Notice
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
ABOUT US
  • Who we are
  • Register
  • Contact us
  • Contributors
  • Company Awards
DIGITAL ISSUES/GUIDELINES
  • Digital issues - Library
  • Supplements - Library
  • Guidelines
Accreditations
IPSO_FLAG_TEAL 2025.png cpdcertified.png

Pinpoint Scotland Ltd (Registered in Scotland No. SC068684) | © 2025 - Website by Gecko Agency