This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.  Read our Cookies Policy.
Close
Eye News
  • Features
    • Close
    • Features
    • Allied Professions
    • Humanitarian
    • Interviews
    • AI & Oculomics
    • Ophthalmology
    • Optometry
    • Podcast videos
    • Supplements
  • Education
    • Close
    • Education
    • Learning Curve
    • Quiz
    • Top Tips
    • Trainees
    • Medico-Legal
    • The Truth Behind The Headlines
    • Case Reports
    • Pete's Bogus Journey
  • Reviews
    • Close
    • Reviews
    • Book Reviews
    • Journal Reviews
    • What's trending?
    • Tech Reviews
    • My Top Five
    • The Culture Section
  • Events
  • News
  • Product Guide
  • Industry News
  • Contact us
    • Close
    • Contact us
    • Write for Eye News
  • Home
  • Reviews
  • Journal Reviews
  • Development of testing protocols for high and low contrast visual acuity

Development of testing protocols for high and low contrast visual acuity
Reviewed by Claire Howard

1 April 2018 | Claire Howard | EYE - Neuro-ophthalmology | Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, LCD tablet, high-contrast visual acuity, low-contrast visual acuity, pinhole

Dysfunction of the afferent visual system, characterised by impairments in high-contrast visual acuity (HCVA) and low-contrast visual acuity (LCVA) have been demonstrated in some neurological conditions such as multiple sclerosis and Parkinson’s disease. HCVA and LCVA are also potential quantitative markers of neurological dysfunction in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). These afferent visual systems are not routinely tested in neurology settings, in the main due to the complex nature and duration of gold standard (GS) acuity testing protocols. The authors used this study to compare simplified gold standard visual acuity protocols. Monocular HCVA and LCVA were measured in patients with ALS (n=10) and four healthy controls, using six protocols, varying by two chart and three refraction methods. Results showed that interclass correlation coefficients between simplified and GS protocols ranged from 0.83 to 0.98 (HCVA – showing excellent agreement) and 0.56 to 0.75 (LCVA, showing moderate agreement). Differences between LCVA and GS protocols exceeded test-retest reliability. Simplified HCVA protocols using LCD tablet charts and / or pinhole correction produced valid measurements. However, none of the modified LCVA testing protocols produced valid measurements. The results of this study support the use of LCD tablets to display charts and use of pinhole to correct refractive error for HCVA measurement only in patients with ALS. Additional research using a larger sample is needed to validate the modified HCVA protocols and to develop simplified LCVA protocols.

Validation of simplified visual acuity testing protocols in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.
Boven LC, Jiang QL, Moss HE.
NEURO-OPHTHALMOLOGY
2017;41(5):247-52.
Share This
CONTRIBUTOR
Claire Howard

Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust, Salford, UK.

View Full Profile
Specialty
  • EYE - Cataract
  • EYE - Cornea
  • EYE - General
  • EYE - Glaucoma
  • EYE - Neuro-ophthalmology
  • EYE - Oculoplastic
  • EYE - Oncology
  • EYE - Orbit
  • EYE - Paediatrics
  • EYE - Pathology
  • EYE - Refractive
  • EYE - Strabismus
  • EYE - Vitreo-Retinal
Archive
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013

Top Of Page

9 Gayfield Square, 
Edinburgh EH1 3NT, UK.

Call: +44 (0)131 557 4184
www.pinpoint-scotland.com

WEBSITE DETAILS
  • Cookie Policy
  • Data Protection Notice
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
ABOUT US
  • Who we are
  • Register
  • Contact us
  • Contributors
  • Company Awards
DIGITAL ISSUES/GUIDELINES
  • Digital issues - Library
  • Supplements - Library
  • Guidelines
Accreditations
IPSO_FLAG_TEAL 2025.png cpdcertified.png

Pinpoint Scotland Ltd (Registered in Scotland No. SC068684) | © 2025 - Website by Gecko Agency