This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.  Read our Cookies Policy.
Close
Eye News
  • Features
    • Close
    • Features
    • Allied Professions
    • Humanitarian
    • Interviews
    • AI & Oculomics
    • Ophthalmology
    • Optometry
    • Podcast videos
    • Supplements
  • Education
    • Close
    • Education
    • Learning Curve
    • Quiz
    • Top Tips
    • Trainees
    • Medico-Legal
    • The Truth Behind The Headlines
    • Case Reports
    • Pete's Bogus Journey
  • Reviews
    • Close
    • Reviews
    • Book Reviews
    • Journal Reviews
    • What's trending?
    • Tech Reviews
    • My Top Five
    • The Culture Section
  • Events
  • News
  • Product Guide
  • Industry News
  • Contact us
    • Close
    • Contact us
    • Write for Eye News
  • Home
  • Reviews
  • Journal Reviews
  • Complications with porous orbital implant after enucleation in retinoblastoma patients

Complications with porous orbital implant after enucleation in retinoblastoma patients
Reviewed by Rina Bhatt

1 April 2019 | Rina Bhatt | EYE - Orbit

This is a retrospective, case control study aimed to identify risk factors associated with complications in retinoblastoma patients following primary and secondary enucleations with porous implant placements. Patients with retinoblastoma who underwent enucleation with porous orbital implant placement between January 2010 and July 2015 were included. Out of the 103 enucleated eyes of 101 patients diagnosed with retinoblastoma, 70 eyes had primary enucleation and 33 eyes received therapy prior to enucleation. Overall 19 eyes (18.4%) experienced postoperative complications, with an exposure rate of 11.7% overall. Age at enucleation was 24 months or younger. Hispanic ethnicity, female gender and intravenous chemotherapy prior to enucleation were associated with increased odds of implant complications. On the contrary, patients who received intravitreal Melphalan, subtenons Carboplatin or external beam radiotherapy did not demonstrate an increased risk of complications. The average time to complication from the enucleation date is not known. Another limitation is lack of comparison with alternative options such as nonporous implants, and dermis fat graft to manage the anophthalmic sockets post enucleation in this group of patients.

Porous orbital implant after enucleation in retinoblastoma patients: indications and complications.
Lang P, Kim JW, McGovern K, et al.
ORBIT
2018;37:438-43.
Share This
CONTRIBUTOR
Rina Bhatt

Wolverhampton Eye Infirmary, UK.

View Full Profile
Specialty
  • EYE - Cataract
  • EYE - Cornea
  • EYE - General
  • EYE - Glaucoma
  • EYE - Neuro-ophthalmology
  • EYE - Oculoplastic
  • EYE - Oncology
  • EYE - Orbit
  • EYE - Paediatrics
  • EYE - Pathology
  • EYE - Refractive
  • EYE - Strabismus
  • EYE - Vitreo-Retinal
Archive
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013

Top Of Page

9 Gayfield Square, 
Edinburgh EH1 3NT, UK.

Call: +44 (0)131 557 4184
www.pinpoint-scotland.com

WEBSITE DETAILS
  • Cookie Policy
  • Data Protection Notice
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
ABOUT US
  • Who we are
  • Register
  • Contact us
  • Contributors
  • Company Awards
DIGITAL ISSUES/GUIDELINES
  • Digital issues - Library
  • Supplements - Library
  • Guidelines
Accreditations
IPSO_FLAG_TEAL 2025.png cpdcertified.png

Pinpoint Scotland Ltd (Registered in Scotland No. SC068684) | © 2025 - Website by Gecko Agency