This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.  Read our Cookies Policy.
Close
Eye News
  • Features
    • Close
    • Features
    • Allied Professions
    • Humanitarian
    • Interviews
    • AI & Oculomics
    • Ophthalmology
    • Optometry
    • Podcast videos
    • Supplements
  • Education
    • Close
    • Education
    • Learning Curve
    • Quiz
    • Top Tips
    • Trainees
    • Medico-Legal
    • The Truth Behind The Headlines
    • Case Reports
    • Pete's Bogus Journey
  • Reviews
    • Close
    • Reviews
    • Book Reviews
    • Journal Reviews
    • What's trending?
    • Tech Reviews
    • My Top Five
    • The Culture Section
  • Events
  • News
  • Product Guide
  • Industry News
  • Contact us
    • Close
    • Contact us
    • Write for Eye News
  • Home
  • Reviews
  • Journal Reviews
  • Clinical and anatomical differences for heavy eye syndrome, highly myopic sagging eye syndrome, and sagging eye syndrome

Clinical and anatomical differences for heavy eye syndrome, highly myopic sagging eye syndrome, and sagging eye syndrome
Reviewed by Fiona Rowe

3 October 2024 | Fiona Rowe (Prof) | EYE - Paediatrics, EYE - Strabismus
Share This

The authors explored the mechanisms underlying the development of heavy eye syndrome (HES), highly myopic sagging eye syndrome (SES)-like, and SES with the aim to differentiate the three conditions clinically and anatomically to aid treatment decision-making. This was a retrospective study including five patients (nine eyes) with strabismic highly myopic eyes with progressive esotropia and hypotropia, nine patients (eight eyes) with high myopia and highly myopic SES, and 22 patients (44 eyes) with SES. Mean age was 69.2 ±10.3, 69.1 ±7.8 and 73.8 ±9.6 years, mean axial length was 29.6 ±1.0, 29.0 ±1.5 and 23.7 ±0.9mm, mean distance esotropia was 48.0 ±19.9, 4.6 ±1.5 and 6.1 ±4.6PD, and mean lateral rectus / superior rectus displacement angle was 152.3 ±16.7, 125.0 ±7.1 and 112.5 ±7.5 degrees, respectively, for the three conditions. Mean distance hypotropia was 5.3 ±5.9PD for myopic SES and 4.8 ±2.7PD for SES. Lateral / superior rectus displacement angle was significantly different across groups. On MR imaging, all patients with HES had severe superotemporal globe prolapse. This was not seen in myopic SES. All cases of HES and six of 18 eyes with myopic SES had posterior staphyloma. The authors conclude myopic SES shows similar characteristics to SES such as lateral rectus displacement. However, the globe is more dislocated in SES which may influence management decisions.

Magnetic resonance imaging findings of high myopic strabismus with sagging eye-like symptoms, heavy eye syndrome and non-highly myopic eyes with sagging eye syndrome.
Tamura K, Kimoto K, Kubota T.
STRABISMUS
2024;32(1):48–53.
Share This
Fiona Rowe (Prof)
CONTRIBUTOR
Fiona Rowe (Prof)

Institute of Population Health, University of Liverpool, UK.

View Full Profile
Specialty
  • EYE - Cataract
  • EYE - Cornea
  • EYE - General
  • EYE - Glaucoma
  • EYE - Neuro-ophthalmology
  • EYE - Oculoplastic
  • EYE - Oncology
  • EYE - Orbit
  • EYE - Paediatrics
  • EYE - Pathology
  • EYE - Refractive
  • EYE - Strabismus
  • EYE - Vitreo-Retinal
Archive
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013

Top Of Page

9 Gayfield Square, 
Edinburgh EH1 3NT, UK.

Call: +44 (0)131 557 4184
www.pinpoint-scotland.com

WEBSITE DETAILS
  • Cookie Policy
  • Data Protection Notice
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
ABOUT US
  • Who we are
  • Register
  • Contact us
  • Contributors
  • Company Awards
DIGITAL ISSUES/GUIDELINES
  • Digital issues - Library
  • Supplements - Library
  • Guidelines
Accreditations
IPSO_FLAG_TEAL 2025.png cpdcertified.png

Pinpoint Scotland Ltd (Registered in Scotland No. SC068684) | © 2025 - Website by Gecko Agency