This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.  Read our Cookies Policy.
Close
Eye News
  • Features
    • Close
    • Features
    • Allied Professions
    • Humanitarian
    • Interviews
    • AI & Oculomics
    • Ophthalmology
    • Optometry
    • Podcast videos
    • Supplements
  • Education
    • Close
    • Education
    • Learning Curve
    • Quiz
    • Top Tips
    • Trainees
    • Medico-Legal
    • The Truth Behind The Headlines
    • Case Reports
    • Pete's Bogus Journey
  • Reviews
    • Close
    • Reviews
    • Book Reviews
    • Journal Reviews
    • What's trending?
    • Tech Reviews
    • My Top Five
    • The Culture Section
  • Events
  • News
  • Product Guide
  • Industry News
  • Contact us
    • Close
    • Contact us
    • Write for Eye News
  • Home
  • Reviews
  • Journal Reviews
  • Aspheric toric IOL implantation and LRI in eyes with cataracts and astigmatism

Aspheric toric IOL implantation and LRI in eyes with cataracts and astigmatism
Reviewed by Jonathan Chan

1 June 2016 | Jonathan Chan | EYE - Cataract, EYE - Refractive | Treatment Surgery

This is a prospective study from a single unit to compare the visual outcome of aspheric toric intraocular lens (IOL) implantation and limbal relaxing incisions (LRI) for management of coexisting age-related cataracts and astigmatism. Sixty eyes of 60 patients with visual significant cataracts and coexisting corneal astigmatism ≤3 dioptres were randomised to undergo phacoemulsification with either aspheric toric IOL or aspheric monofocal IOL with LRI. The main outcome measures were postoperative three month uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), contrast sensitivity, rotational stability of the toric IOL and spectacle independence. Both groups achieved significantly better than baseline measurements for postoperative UCVA, contrast sensitivity and refractive astigmatism (p≤0.001). There was no significant difference detected for these parameters between LRI and toric IOL groups postoperatively. At both postoperative month one and three, the percentages of eyes in need of spectacles were lower in the toric group than the LRI group (p≤0.030). IOL misalignment was noted in three eyes in the toric group (mean misalignment 7.67±4.04°). On the vector analysis, magnitude of error (ME) was negative in the LRI group indicating undercorrection, whereas the ME was close to zero for toric group. There were no IOL misaligned more than 10° axis of rotation. None of the eyes required any extra surgical intervention. The authors conclude that both toric IOL implantation and LRI were effective in correcting corneal astigmatism ≤3 dioptres during phacoemulsification, while LRI tended to undercorrect astigmatism. The authors also conclude that the limitations of the study related to the sample size, which was relatively small. Post hoc power analysis showed that this study had a power of 34.8% to detect a significant difference of postoperative astigmatism at three months between toric IOL and LRI. Another limitation of this study was short follow-up period.

Comparative evaluation of aspheric toric intraocular lens implantation and limbal relaxing incisions in eyes with cataracts and ≤3 dioptres of astigmatism.
Lam DKT, Chow VWS, Ye C, et al.
BRITISH JOURNAL OF OPTHALMOLOGY
2016;100:258-62.
Share This
CONTRIBUTOR
Jonathan Chan

Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Sheffield, UK.

View Full Profile
Specialty
  • EYE - Cataract
  • EYE - Cornea
  • EYE - General
  • EYE - Glaucoma
  • EYE - Neuro-ophthalmology
  • EYE - Oculoplastic
  • EYE - Oncology
  • EYE - Orbit
  • EYE - Paediatrics
  • EYE - Pathology
  • EYE - Refractive
  • EYE - Strabismus
  • EYE - Vitreo-Retinal
Archive
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013

Top Of Page

9 Gayfield Square, 
Edinburgh EH1 3NT, UK.

Call: +44 (0)131 557 4184
www.pinpoint-scotland.com

WEBSITE DETAILS
  • Cookie Policy
  • Data Protection Notice
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
ABOUT US
  • Who we are
  • Register
  • Contact us
  • Contributors
  • Company Awards
DIGITAL ISSUES/GUIDELINES
  • Digital issues - Library
  • Supplements - Library
  • Guidelines
Accreditations
IPSO_FLAG_TEAL 2025.png cpdcertified.png

Pinpoint Scotland Ltd (Registered in Scotland No. SC068684) | © 2025 - Website by Gecko Agency