This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.  Read our Cookies Policy.
Close
Eye News
  • Features
    • Close
    • Features
    • Allied Professions
    • Humanitarian
    • Interviews
    • AI & Oculomics
    • Ophthalmology
    • Optometry
    • Podcast videos
    • Supplements
  • Education
    • Close
    • Education
    • Learning Curve
    • Quiz
    • Top Tips
    • Trainees
    • Medico-Legal
    • The Truth Behind The Headlines
    • Case Reports
    • Pete's Bogus Journey
  • Reviews
    • Close
    • Reviews
    • Book Reviews
    • Journal Reviews
    • What's trending?
    • Tech Reviews
    • My Top Five
    • The Culture Section
  • Events
  • News
  • Product Guide
  • Industry News
  • Contact us
    • Close
    • Contact us
    • Write for Eye News
  • Home
  • Education
  • Quiz
  • Quiz Apr/May 2019

Apr/May 2019 Quiz

1 April 2019 | Luciane Dreher Irion | EYE - General
Share This

 

History

 

  • A 68-year-old female patient was referred from her GP with bilateral conjunctival lesions on her upper eyelids which cause local irritation and dry eyes.
  • Her past ophthalmic history is uneventful.
  • However, systemically she has history of high blood pressure and episodes of increasing shortness of breath.
  • On examination, she had several small pale lumps on upper eyelids (Figure 1).
  • A conjunctival biopsy was performed and material sent for ophthalmic pathology assessment.

 

Figure 1.

 

Figure 2a.

 

Figure 2b.

 

Figure 3.

 

Questions

  1. Figure 2A shows a representative field of the biopsied material. What does it demonstrate?
  2. What do the arrows show on Figures 2B and 3?
  3. What is the morphological differential diagnosis? Are there any special stains which would help refining the diagnosis?
  4. On follow-up the patient had chest x-ray done (due to her respiratory symptoms). The x-ray confirmed hilar adenopathy and reticulonodular infiltrate. She also had an abnormal blood test result. What was the likely test performed?
  5. Taking together clinico-radiological features and morphological findings, what is the most likely diagnosis?

 

 

 





 

 

 

Answers

 

1. Well-defined non-necrotising epithelioid granulomas surrounded by mild fibrous bands and an inflammatory infiltrate.
2. Multinucleate giant cells. In Figure 2B the giant cells contain asteroid bodies (small, intracytoplasmic, eosinophilic star shaped structures) in their cytoplasm.
3. The main differential diagnoses are sarcoidosis, mycobacteriosis and fungal infection. Ziehl-Neelsen stain is required for the diagnosis of mycobacteriosis / tuberculosis and both periodic acid Schiff (PAS) and Grocott are helpful in confirming fungal infection.
4. Angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE). Serum ACE levels can be increased in this condition.
5. Sarcoidosis.

 

 

COMMENTS ARE WELCOME

Share This
Luciane Dreher Irion
CONTRIBUTOR
Luciane Dreher Irion

National Specialist Ophthalmic Pathology Service, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.

View Full Profile
Originally Published
EYE NEWS VOLUME 25 ISSUE 6 APRIL/MAY 2019
Download the full article
Download Article

Top Of Page

9 Gayfield Square, 
Edinburgh EH1 3NT, UK.

Call: +44 (0)131 557 4184
www.pinpoint-scotland.com

WEBSITE DETAILS
  • Cookie Policy
  • Data Protection Notice
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
ABOUT US
  • Who we are
  • Register
  • Contact us
  • Contributors
  • Company Awards
DIGITAL ISSUES/GUIDELINES
  • Digital issues - Library
  • Supplements - Library
  • Guidelines
Accreditations
IPSO_FLAG_TEAL 2025.png cpdcertified.png

Pinpoint Scotland Ltd (Registered in Scotland No. SC068684) | © 2025 - Website by Gecko Agency