This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.  Read our Cookies Policy.
Close
Eye News
  • Features
    • Close
    • Features
    • Allied Professions
    • Humanitarian
    • Interviews
    • AI & Oculomics
    • Ophthalmology
    • Optometry
    • Podcast videos
    • Supplements
  • Education
    • Close
    • Education
    • Learning Curve
    • Quiz
    • Top Tips
    • Trainees
    • Medico-Legal
    • The Truth Behind The Headlines
    • Case Reports
    • Pete's Bogus Journey
  • Reviews
    • Close
    • Reviews
    • Book Reviews
    • Journal Reviews
    • What's trending?
    • Tech Reviews
    • My Top Five
    • The Culture Section
  • Events
  • News
  • Product Guide
  • Industry News
  • Contact us
    • Close
    • Contact us
    • Write for Eye News
  • Home
  • Education
  • Quiz
  • Quiz Oct/Nov 2016

Oct/Nov 2016 Quiz

1 October 2016 | EYE - Cataract, EYE - Cornea, EYE - Glaucoma, EYE - Imaging, EYE - Neuro-ophthalmology, EYE - Oculoplastic, EYE - Oncology, EYE - Orbit, EYE - Paediatrics, EYE - Pathology, EYE - Refractive, EYE - Strabismus, EYE - Vitreo-Retinal, EYE - General
Share This

 

History

 

  • A 67-year-old female patient had chronic left canaliculitis becoming painful and more recently complicated by left lower blepharitis.
  • Examination revealed a small fleshy lump on the medial aspect of the left lower eyelid. There was also swelling of the punctum and discharge of pus and yellow concretions upon expression.
  • Excision of the lump was performed along with canalicular curettage. Specimens sent for ophthalmic histopathological assessment.

 

Figure 1 (top and above).

 

Figure 2.

 

Figure 3 (top and above).

 

 

Questions

 

  1. What does Figure 1 show?
  2.  Figure 2 represents H&E stained material from lacrimal sac. What is it?
  3. What does Figure 3 show and which was the stain used?
  4. What is the most likely diagnosis, and what is the most common causative agent?
  5. Which other micro-organisms may show similar granules and how is a definitive diagnosis achieved?

 

 



 

 

Answers

 

1. This is a pyogenic granuloma which consists of a haemangioma-like vascular proliferation with oedematous stroma infiltrated by mixed inflammatory cells including plentiful neutrophils and usually with surface erosion.
2. The image shows amorphous hematoxiphilic material representing sulphur granules which ultimately consist of tangled filamentous bacteria. This term may be misleading, as the granules do not contain sulphur. The name actually relates to the yellow colour of the granule in pus.
3. Gram stained section demonstrating gram-positive filamentous bacteria.
4. Canaliculitis due to Actinomyces (anaerobic, gram positive, filamentous or rod bacteria). The most common causative agent is Actinomyces israelii.
5. Nocardia brasiliensis or Streptomyces madurae may show similar granules. The definitive diagnosis requires culture of the pathogen.

 

 

COMMENTS ARE WELCOME

Share This
Originally Published
EYE NEWS VOLUME 23 ISSUE 3 OCTOBER/NOVEMBER 2016
Download the full article
Download Article

Top Of Page

9 Gayfield Square, 
Edinburgh EH1 3NT, UK.

Call: +44 (0)131 557 4184
www.pinpoint-scotland.com

WEBSITE DETAILS
  • Cookie Policy
  • Data Protection Notice
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
ABOUT US
  • Who we are
  • Register
  • Contact us
  • Contributors
  • Company Awards
DIGITAL ISSUES/GUIDELINES
  • Digital issues - Library
  • Supplements - Library
  • Guidelines
Accreditations
IPSO_FLAG_TEAL 2025.png cpdcertified.png

Pinpoint Scotland Ltd (Registered in Scotland No. SC068684) | © 2025 - Website by Gecko Agency