Share This

 

History

 

  • A seven-year-old atopic boy has been treated for phlyctenulosis with mild topical steroids. However, he developed dramatic changes at the right limbus in two weeks. He also had past history of vernal keratoconjunctivitis (VKC) with poor compliance to treatment.
  • On examination there was a raised fleshy yellow-pink limbal lesion from 6 to 2 o’clock on the right temporal bulbar conjunctiva (Figure 1). The lesion encroached the cornea and had prominent conjunctival and episcleral vessels.
  • Gonioscopy confirmed corneal indentation and pigmentation. Anterior chamber angle was open.
  • Blood tests revealed eosinophilia but normal white cell count.
  • Given the range of differential diagnosis including neoplasia, an 8mm excisional biopsy was performed and the specimen sent for histopathological assessment.

 

 

Figure 1.

 

Figure 2.

 

Figure 3.

 

 

Questions

 

  1. Considering the history and clinical features (Figure 1) what differential diagnoses would be considered?
  2. How can the histology of the excised lesion (Figure 2) be described?
  3. Figure 3 shows immunohistochemistry for CD68 and CD1a. How could these be interpreted?
  4. Would any other markers be useful for diagnostic confirmation / exclusion?
  5. What is the most likely diagnosis?

 

 

 

 

 

 

Answers

 

1. In view of history of atopia and previous VKC, the possibility of reactivation of unusual VKC should be considered. However, the fleshy salmon coloured presentation could also indicate a reactive or neoplastic lymphoproliferative disorder. A rapid growing rhabdomyosarcoma would also be included in the differential diagnosis. Therefore a biopsy was required to exclude malignancy. 2. The biopsy shows limbal conjunctival epithelium being replaced by squamous metaplasia, especially observed at the bottom left insert. In addition, there is widespread inflammatory process including histiocytes and plentiful eosinophils (bottom right insert). Eosinophils also infiltrate the epithelium. There is no lymphocytic proliferation.
3. The brown staining in the top image highlights CD68 positive histiocytes. These are, however, CD1a negative, which would make the possibility of Langerhans cell histiocytosis unlikely.
4. A negative S100 in addition to CD1a result would support the unlikelihood of Langerhans cell histiocytosis. Morphologically, both lymphoma and rhabdomyosarcoma are also unlikely. Negative lymphoid (e.g. CD3 and CD20) and muscle (e.g. desmin and myoD1) markers would support this. 5. Vernal keratoconjunctivitis.

 

 

COMMENTS ARE WELCOME
Would you like to comment on the topics raised within this article?
Email chris@pinpoint-scotland.com and, once approved, your comment will be published here.

 

Share This